D 3, respectively); (e) elements E, D (current D (initial pH, flow
D 3, respectively); (e) aspects E, D (current D (initial pH, flow rate, flowMoveltipril References chloride ionA/m2 , 6.five, andof 6.5,mL/min, respectively); respectively);D (present (d) elements B, density, initial pH, and and rate of 28.3 concentration 82.five 82.5 mL/min, and three, (f) components A, (e) aspects density, flow rate, and initial pH, and flow price of of 28.3 A/m2 , 82.5 mL/min, and 3, respectively); and (g) components A, E E, D (present density, chloride ion concentration 28.3 A/m2, 6.5, and 82.five mL/min, respectively); (f) components A, D (current density, flow price, and chloride ion concentration of 28.three , 82.five 82.5 mL/min, and 3, respectively); (present density, flow rate, and reaction time of 28.3 A/m2 A/m2,mL/min, and 90 min, respectively). and (g) elements A, E (present density, flow price, and reaction time of 28.three A/m2, 82.five mL/min, and 90 min, respectively).Components 2021, 14,through the electrooxidation course of action of the titanium suboxide electrode. As shown in Figure 6c, the three principal peaks are Ex/Em = 25000/45000 (peak A), 30075/45000 (peak B), and 35065/32550 (peak C). As outlined by Figure 6d, just after 20 min of reaction, the fluorescence intensity of peaks A and B disappeared, whereas peak C increased, indicating that the conjugated heterocyclic structure of LVX was destroyed. Because the reaction time 12 of 18 increases, Ex/Em = 35065/32550 (peak C) in Figure 6g also disappear gradually, indicating that LVX was all converted into smaller YTX-465 site molecules.Fluorescence Intensity0min 20min 40min 60min 80min 100min 120min700 600 500 400 300 200 100(a)700 600 500 400 300 200 100Fluorescence Intensity(b)Ex(nm)0min 20min 40min 60min 80min 100min 120min600 550 500 450 400 350(c)C B A600 550 500 Ex(nm) 450 400 350250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Wavelength(nm)(d)C250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)1325 1159 993 826 660 494 328 161 -600 550 500 450 400 350250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Wavelength(nm)(e)250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm) 1030 600 (f) 9011600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)771 642 513 383 254 124 -500 Ex(nm) 450 400 350 300 250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)945 826 708 589 470 351 233 114 -600 550 500 Ex(nm) 450 400 350Ex(nm)(g)250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)925 809 693 576 460 344 228 111 -600 550 500 Ex(nm) 450 400 350(h)250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)920 804 689 573 458 342 226 111 -600 550 500 Ex(nm) 450 400 350(i)250 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Em(nm)826 723 619 516 412 309 205 102 -Figure six. (a) Fluorescence spectra of LVX at emission wavelength of 510 nm. (b) Fluorescence spectra of LVX at 290 nm Figure six. (a) Fluorescence spectra of LVX at emission wavelength of 510 nm. (b) Fluorescence spectra of LVX at 290 nm excitation wavelength. Three-dimensional EEMs of LVX solution following electrocatalysis degradation of (c) 0, (d) 20, (e) 40, excitation wavelength. Three-dimensional EEMs of LVX solution immediately after electrocatalysis degradation of (c) 0, (d) 20, (e) 40, (f) 60, (g) 80, (h) one hundred, and (i) 120 min by titanium suboxide anode. (f) 60, (g) 80, (h) one hundred, and (i) 120 min by titanium suboxide anode.Figure 7a shows that below optimal reaction situations, the removal rate of LVX Figure 7a shows that under optimal reaction circumstances, the removal price of LVX reached 41 , which was fundamentally consistent with all the outcome predicted by the response reached 41 , which was fundamentally consistent together with the outcome predicted by the response surface (40.84 ). As shown in Figure 7b, the LVX convers.